Add Counsel to Your Code.

Counsel in every commit

Pathways pause a risky change in the diff, before it merges, with the ways forward and the risk each one leaves.

Your data stays on your Mac

Checks like the free-entry ratio, entries from blocked states and price divergence run on your Mac against a read-only role; only the measured results leave it, never a row, and nothing you build trains a model.

Law-firm ready, state by state

Stage one: as you decide, Apparently scores each state out of 100 and shows where a law firm would likely opine, and drafts the officer’s certificate your firm will ask for, from rules a gaming attorney formerly of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP wrote from each state’s statute and its regulator’s guidance.

Processor ready, then launch

Stage two holds each state to the stricter line a payment processor’s review uses; hold back any state that is not ready yet, launch in the rest now, and submit whenever you choose.

1. Two scores for every state. Law-firm ready once a state’s risk is low or medium; processor ready once it is low. Each state shows both, beside your overall scores.
2. Climb toward 100/100. Your next best moves are ranked by how much each one adds, and every change is recorded, so you can watch the climb.
3. Hold back a state, launch the rest. Not ready somewhere? Block it, or hold it until you have a legal opinion for it, and go live in the other states now. Or keep revising until it reaches the risk level you want.
4. Submit whenever you choose. A readiness packet freezes today’s scores, every state and every state you held back, for your law firm or your processor.

Scores are measured from your facts, code, data and documents, not a legal conclusion: your law firm decides what it can opine on, and your processor still reviews what you submit. The example below is a fictional operator.

Public legal docs, built for you

Your terms, official rules, free-entry page and privacy policy are drafted from what your code and database actually do, and redrafted when they change.

Bank review in 24 hours

Every bank and payment processor requires a legal opinion from a gaming company; submit yours, and each fact in it is tested against your code, database and documents, with findings and the ways to fix them back in 24 hours.* An independent firm signs it. Paid by your bank.

* Timing varies with your company’s stage and the states you operate in.

Resubmit, and see what changed

Round two is checked against round one, and every fix carries its proof: the commit, the database check before and after, the page that changed.

Approved, launch

Counsel reads each section, scores its risk and approves it; any conditions arrive with the exact edit, who makes it and by when, and your bank sees the same decision.

Stay approved

Your bank watches a live risk score for you, built from hourly re-checks and the laws on the way; you see exactly what it sees, and what to do first.