Arizona names three licence types, separating service providers and sports wagering providers.
Colorado names four licence types, separating suppliers, sports wagering providers and non-gaming vendors.
Connecticut names two licence types for interactive operators.
Illinois names three licence types, separating suppliers, sports wagering providers and service providers.
Indiana names four licence types, separating suppliers, sports wagering providers and service providers.
Iowa names four licence types, separating manufacturers and sports wagering providers.
Louisiana names three licence types, separating suppliers, non-gaming vendors and sports wagering providers.
Maryland names four licence types for service providers.
Massachusetts names three licence types, separating service providers and non-gaming vendors.
Michigan names five licence types, separating suppliers, manufacturers, sports wagering providers and service providers.
Mississippi names three licence types, separating suppliers, manufacturers and non-gaming vendors.
Nevada names four licence types, separating manufacturers, service providers and non-gaming vendors.
New Jersey names two licence types.
New York names five licence types, separating service providers, sports wagering providers and non-gaming vendors.
Ohio names four licence types, separating service providers, sports wagering providers and non-gaming vendors.
Pennsylvania names five licence types, separating suppliers, manufacturers and service providers.
Tennessee names two licence types for sports wagering providers.
Tribal names two licence types, separating service providers and non-gaming vendors.
Virginia names four licence types, separating suppliers and sports wagering providers.
Washington names three licence types, separating sports wagering providers, manufacturers and distributors.
West Virginia names three licence types, separating suppliers and sports wagering providers.
A description of the rules loaded, not a legal conclusion about your product.